AJP - GI AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 248: G526-G531, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robotham, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fox, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robotham, H.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 5 526-G531, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Muscarinic inhibition of canine small intestinal motility in vivo

J. E. Fox, E. E. Daniel, J. Jury and H. Robotham

The quiescent canine gastrointestinal tract responsed to close intraarterial acetylcholine with an atropine-sensitive, hexamethonium, and tetrodotoxin-insensitive contraction, thus suggesting acetylcholine interacts with a muscarinic receptor located on the muscle. When the gut is actively contracting (spontaneously, in response to field stimulation or to motilin), acetylcholine caused a contraction followed by prolonged inhibition of contractions. No such inhibition was apparent after tetrodotoxin; therefore, the receptor for acetylcholine-induced inhibition was apparently on nerves. Neither the acetylcholine-induced excitation nor the inhibition was altered by hexamethonium or reserpine treatment. Both inhibitory and excitatory responses were greatly reduced by atropine, suggesting that both receptors were muscarinic in nature. McNeil A343 produced inhibition but no excitation. Tetrodotoxin, hexamethonium, reserpine, and pirenzepine all increased the concentration of McNeil A343 required for production of 50% inhibition, suggesting it acts via multiple mechanisms. Furthermore, pirenzepine reduced both the inhibitory and excitatory response to acetylcholine, suggesting that it is nonselective in its action on the neural inhibitory or muscular excitatory receptors. We suggest that the presynaptic muscarinic receptor responsible for inhibitory effects of acetylcholine is on the postganglionic cholinergic neuron itself and constitutes an important negative-feedback loop to reduce excessive cholinergic output. Although such a mechanism has been found in vitro previously, this is the first report in vivo in canine small intestine.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online