AJP - GI AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 249: G668-G673, 1985;
0193-1857/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hirschowitz, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shirakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hirschowitz, B. I.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 249, Issue 6 668-G673, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Interaction between stimuli and their antagonists on frog esophageal peptic glands

T. Shirakawa and B. I. Hirschowitz

The peptic glands, which are located in the mucosa of the distal esophagus in the frog, respond to multiple stimuli. In vitro studies were performed, using mucosal sheets of the esophagus of Rana catesbeiana, during the summer months when the glands are fully responsive to determine whether the receptors for the stimuli [cholinergic, beta-adrenergic, and peptidergic (bombesin but not cholecystokinin)] are specific to the stimuli. Through the use of three classes of antagonist, we found that 1) atropine defined the muscarinic nature of the bethanechol stimulation, 2) propranolol defined the beta-adrenergic nature of stimulation by isoproterenol, and 3) the substance P analogue [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]substance P was specific for the peptide bombesin. No cross-inhibition was seen, and dibutyryl cGMP did not inhibit any of the three stimuli. Moreover, any two of the three stimuli in combination stimulated more pepsinogen than either alone but the same as the sum of the two individual responses. Both lines of evidence indicate that there are at least three independent receptor pathways for stimulation of pepsinogen secretion in these glands.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online