AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 250: G484-G488, 1986;
0193-1857/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hirschowitz, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shirakawa, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hirschowitz, B. I.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 250, Issue 4 484-G488, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Seasonal fluctuations in pepsinogen secretion from frog esophageal peptic glands

T. Shirakawa and B. I. Hirschowitz

The seasonal activity of pepsinogen secretion in the Rana catesbeiana was studied by use of peptic gland bearing esophageal mucosa mounted in a perfused double chamber. The amount of the basal pepsinogen secretion during hibernation (winter) and breeding (spring) periods was approximately 25 and 55% of basal secretion during the active (summer) period. The circumannual variation of basal secretion was highly correlated (r = 0.88, n = 37) with the pepsinogen content of the mucosa. The fractional rate of basal secretion (approximately 2% of content per hour) remained essentially constant, and pepsinogen as a fraction of total protein remained at between 20 and 25%. The results indicate that the decrease in absolute basal secretion from frog peptic glands during winter is a consequence of decreased content and hence synthesis of protein, including pepsinogen, by the mucosa. In addition, stimulated secretory responses to both bethanechol and bombesin, as a multiple of basal rate, were reduced during both hibernation and breeding periods, whereas the response to isoproterenol was entirely abolished during the hibernation period. By contrast, the secretory response to isobutylmethylxanthine remained constant (approximately 200% of basal) through all seasons, suggesting that mechanisms responsible for enzyme translocation and secretion remained intact. Reduced basal and secretagogue-stimulated secretion during hibernation and breeding seasons is thus likely due to a combination of reduced protein synthesis and decreased number or function of agonist receptors in peptic cells of the frog.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online