AJP - GI AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 251: G140-G146, 1986;
0193-1857/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, J. H.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 251, Issue 1 140-G146, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Characterization of substance P effects on canine antral muscle

E. A. Mayer, G. van Deventer, J. Elashoff, S. Khawaja and J. H. Walsh

Synthetic substance P increased the frequency and amplitude of spontaneously occurring contractions of circular and longitudinal muscle strips from canine gastric antrum in vitro. In longitudinal muscle, ED50 values calculated for frequency and amplitude were 3.7 X 10(-9) M and 9.7 X 10(-7) M, respectively. The effect of substance P on frequency in both layers and on amplitude in the circular layer was myogenic and unrelated to receptors for acetylcholine, norepinephrine, serotonin, histamine, and enkephalins. In the longitudinal muscle the amplitude response was partially inhibited by tetrodotoxin, atropine, and hexamethonium. The effect on amplitude but not on frequency was dependent on extracellular calcium. When compared to other stimulants of antral muscle contraction, the biological potency of substance P was higher than that of acetylcholine but significantly lower than that of gastrin and bombesin. Two putative substance P antagonists ([D-Pro2,D-Phe7,D-Trp9]substance P and [D-Pro2, D-Trp7,9]substance P) did not block the response of longitudinal muscle to substance P. Only the chronotropic response to substance P showed consistent, prolonged desensitization. These findings suggest that the mechanisms mediating the response to substance P in the canine antrum are different from other reported tissues.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online