AJP - GI Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 251: G64-G69, 1986;
0193-1857/86 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levan, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Green, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levan, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Green, G. M.

AJP - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, Vol 251, Issue 1 64-G69, Copyright © 1986 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of atropine on rat pancreatic secretory response to trypsin inhibitors and protein

V. H. Levan and G. M. Green

The effect of atropine on the exocrine pancreatic secretory response to intestinally infused trypsin inhibitor and protein in conscious rats was investigated. Bile and pancreatic juice were collected and continuously returned to the intestine throughout all experiments. Ovomucoid trypsin inhibitor (OMTI) was infused at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 30 mg/h id, simultaneously with intravenously infused atropine (100 micrograms X kg-1 X h-1) or 0.15 M NaCl. Casein was infused at 300 mg/h id with or without intravenous atropine. Atropine inhibited basal pancreatic protein and fluid secretion 65.7 and 24.7%, respectively. Atropine had no effect on incremental (above basal) pancreatic protein and fluid output during infusion of maximally effective doses of OMTI (12 and 30 mg/h) and increased the incremental responses to submaximal doses of OMTI and to casein. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that cholecystokinin mediates negative feedback regulation by luminal proteases and that cholinergic mechanisms are not directly involved in this regulatory mechanism.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Yamamoto, J. R. Reeve Jr., D. A. Keire, and G. M. Green
Water and enzyme secretion are tightly coupled in pancreatic secretion stimulated by food or CCK-58 but not by CCK-8
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): G866 - G879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
M. Yamamoto, M. Otani, D.-M. Jia, K.-I. Fukumitsu, H. Yoshikawa, T. Akiyama, and M. Otsuki
Differential mechanism and site of action of CCK on the pancreatic secretion and growth in rats
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2003; 285(4): G681 - G687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online