|
|
||||||||
LIVER AND BILIARY TRACT
1Division of Gastroenterology, Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and 2Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Submitted 7 June 2005 ; accepted in final form 3 July 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6, possibly originating from the mucosa in response to injury, inhibit neurally mediated contraction of esophageal circular muscle but do not affect ACh-induced contraction, reproducing the effect of experimental esophagitis on esophageal contraction. To examine the interaction of mucosa and circular muscle in inflammation, we examined the effect of HCl on in vitro esophageal mucosa and circular muscle. Circular muscle strips, when directly exposed to HCl, contracted normally. However, when circular muscle strips were exposed to supernatants of mucosa incubated in HCl (23 h, pH 5.8), contraction decreased, and the inhibition was partially reversed by an IL-6 antibody. Supernatants from the mucosa of animals with in vivo-induced acute esophagitis (AE) similarly reduced contraction. IL-6 levels were higher in mucosal tissue from AE animals than in control mucosa and in AE mucosa supernatants than in normal mucosa supernatants. IL-6 levels increased significantly in normal mucosa and supernatants in response to HCl, suggesting increased production and release of IL-6 by the mucosa. IL-6 increased H2O2 levels in the circular muscle layer but not in mucosa. Exposure of the mucosa to HCl caused IL-1
to increase only in the mucosa and not in the supernatant. These data suggest that HCl-induced damage occurs first in the mucosa, leading to the production of IL-1
and IL-6 but not H2O2. IL-1
appears to remain in the mucosa. In contrast, IL-6 is produced and released by the mucosa, eventually resulting in the production of H2O2 by the circular muscle, with this affecting circular muscle contraction.
esophageal mucosa; inflammation; smooth muscle contraction; reactive oxygen species; cytokines
and IL-6 (but not TNF-
) are elevated in the esophageal circular muscle layer. Exposure of normal esophageal circular muscle to IL-1
and IL-6 reproduced esophagitis-induced motor dysfunction, i.e., IL-1
and IL-6 inhibited electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced, neurally mediated contraction of the cat esophagus. Similar to in vivo-induced acute esophagitis, IL-1
and IL-6 inhibited ACh release from intramural cholinergic neurons but did not affect contraction in response to direct myogenic stimulation with ACh (3).
In addition, we examined human endoscopic mucosal biopsies, obtained from patients with esophagitis, and reported increased concentration of IL-6 in the inflamed tissue. IL-1
was also elevated when esophageal inflammation was severe (35).
These findings in biopsies from patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are consistent with data obtained in the cat model of in vivo-induced esophagitis and indicate that both acid-induced acute inflammation of the normal mucosa and chronic inflammation of the mucosa of patients with reflux esophagitis are characterized by the overproduction of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1
and IL-6.
These cytokines are thought to derive from inflammatory cells infiltrating acid-damaged tissue (32) and may produce additional inflammatory mediators that may amplify and perpetuate tissue injury (30, 33) by acting on muscle cells and causing them to produce their own cytokines (39). This creates a vicious circle that contributes to and maintains the motility disorders found in gut inflammation (11). For these reasons, examining tissues with fully developed inflammation may provide few clues toward understanding how inflammation develops. Defining the sequential production of inflammatory mediators in reflux esophagitis and their tissues of origin seems essential to better understand the genesis of GERD pathophysiology.
To examine the interaction of the mucosa and circular muscle in originating IL-1
and IL-6 in response to inflammation, we examined the effect of HCl on the in vitro esophageal mucosa and circular muscle, separately and together, in an in vitro model of esophageal inflammation. In this model, the mucosa is freed from the circular and longitudinal muscle by sharp dissection at the level of the submucosa and tied at both ends, creating a mucosal sac, as shown in Fig. 1. The sac, with the squamous epithelium on the inside and the submucosa on the outside, is filled with either Krebs solution or HCl and kept in warm oxygenated Krebs solution. The supernatant surrounding the sac is collected after 23 h and applied to circular muscle strips to examine its effects on contractility or analyzed for content of inflammatory mediators. The inflammatory mediators released by the mucosa from animals with in vivo-induced esophagitis may be compared with those released by the mucosal sac preparation after 23 h of exposure to intraluminal HCl.
|
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To compare this in vitro model of inflammation to in vivo-induced acute esophagitis, some animals had their esophagus perfused with 0.1 N HCl on 3 successive days and were tested on day 4. This procedure has been previously described in detail (3).
pH and cell survival. The in vitro mucosa is affected by relatively small decreases in pH, because it is not perfused by blood and thus forced to the pH of the surrounding medium, without any way of buffering it or clearing it through blood flow. We therefore examined the relationship between cell survival and pH in the lumen of the mucosal sac.
Epithelial cell viability was assessed after a 3-h exposure of the mucosal sac preparation to several acidic solutions of different pH by enzymatically isolating epithelial cells and examining the percentage of cells excluding trypan blue.
In a separate assessment of cell viability, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released in the supernatant outside the sac was measured and expressed as a percentage of LDH present in the tissue, as an index of cell death. LDH was measured with a kit (catalog no. 1 644 793, Roche Applied Science; Indianapolis, IN).
Measurements of contraction. Circular muscle strips devoid of mucosa (2 mm wide) were mounted in separate 1-ml muscle chambers as previously described in detail (5). They were initially stretched to 2.5 g to bring them near conditions of optimum force development and equilibrated for 2 h while being perfused continuously with oxygenated physiological salt solution (PSS) at 37°C. PSS contained the following (in mmol/l): 116.6 NaCl, 21.9 NaHCO3, 1.2 KH2PO4, 3.4 KCl, 2.5 CaCl2, 5.4 glucose, and 1.2 MgCl2. The solution was equilibrated with a gas mixture containing 95% O2-5% CO2 at 37°C, pH 7.4. After equilibration, esophageal strips were stimulated with EFS, which consisted of 10-s trains of square-wave pulses of supramaximal voltage (0.2-ms duration at 0.55 Hz). The stimuli were delivered by a stimulator (model S48, Grass Instruments) through platinum wire electrodes placed longitudinally on either side of the strip.
To study the effect of supernatant from HCl-treated mucosa or of selected cytokines on EFS-induced contraction, the strips were incubated in supernatant or in appropriate concentrations of the cytokines for 2 h before contraction in response to EFS.
Measurements of IL-1
and IL-6.
Esophageal circular muscle (100 mg) was homogenized in 2 ml PBS (Sigma; St. Louis, MO; pH 7.4) containing 0.01 M phosphate buffer, 0.0027 M KCl, and 0.137 M NaCI. Homogenization was achieved with three 10- to 20-s bursts with a Tissue Tearer (Biospec; Racine, WI). The homogenate or supernatant was centrifuged at 2000 g and 4°C for 20 min. An aliquot of homogenate was taken for protein determination. The supernatant was frozen in liquid nitrogen for later use. The tissue concentrations of cytokines were measured using enzyme immunoassay kits from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) for IL-6 and R&D Systems (Minneopolis, MN) for IL-1
.
Measurements of H2O2 in smooth muscle tissue and supernatant. Esophageal mucosa or esophageal circular smooth muscle tissue (100 mg) were homogenized in 20 mM Tris·HCl buffer. Homogenization consisted of a 20-s burst with a Tissue Tearer (Biospec) followed by 50 strokes with a Dounce tissue grinder (Wheaton; Melville, NJ). An aliquot of homogenate (100 µl) was taken for protein measurement. The homogenate or supernatant was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (2,500 g) for 15 min at 4°C in a Beckman J221 centrifuge with a fixed-angle JA-20 rotor (Beckman; Palo Alto, CA), and the supernatant was collected.
H2O2 content was measured by a BIOXYTECH H2O2-560 Quantitative Hydrogen Peroxide Assay Kit (OXIS; Portland, OR). This assay is based on the oxidation of ferrous ions (Fe2+) to ferric ions (Fe3+) by H2O2 under acidic conditions. The ferric ion binds with the indicator dye xylenol orange {3,3'-bis[N,N-di(carboxymethyl)-aminomethyl]-o-cresolsulfone-phthalein sodium salt} to form a stable colored complex, which can be measured at 560 nm.
Protein determination. The amount of protein present was determined by a colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad; Melville, NY) according to the method of Bradford (2).
Materials.
Antibodies to IL-1
and IL-6 were purchased from R&D Systems. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma.
Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical differences between means were determined by Student's t-test. Differences between multiple groups were tested using ANOVA for repeated measures and checked for significance using Scheffé's F-test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6 are present in the esophageal muscle layer of animals with esophagitis and, when applied to normal esophageal circular smooth muscle in vitro, reproduce esophagitis-induced in vivo changes in motor function (3). To determine whether these inflammatory mediators are produced in esophageal muscle by direct exposure to HCl after breakdown of the mucosal barrier, we directly added HCl into the muscle bath, lowering the pH to 5.8, and recorded EFS-induced muscle contraction after 3 h. Figure 2A shows that direct application of HCl to in vitro circular muscle strips did not cause any change in contraction compared with muscle strips incubated in Krebs buffer for the same length of time. However, if a piece of mucosa (100 mg wet wt/ml bath volume) was added to the bath and the muscle and mucosa together were exposed to HCl at the same pH, EFS-induced contraction was almost abolished after a 3-h incubation. Shorter times were less effective. When muscle strips were incubated with the same amount of mucosa without HCl, no change in contraction occurred compared with strips incubated in Krebs buffer without the mucosa (Fig. 2B).
|
pH and production of cytokines.
We first examined the effect of pH on production and release of inflammatory mediators, such as IL-1
and IL-6. The mucosa tube was filled with PSS at various pHs for 3 h, and IL-1
and IL-6 concentrations were then measured in the mucosa and supernatant surrounding the mucosal sac. Figure 3 shows that in the mucosa, tissue content of IL-1
and IL-6 was highest when the sac was filled with medium at a pH between 5.8 and 4.8 and declined when the pH was lowered to 4, most likely reflecting tissue damage or necrosis. Figure 4A shows that most cells were alive after a 3-h incubation at neutral pH or at pH 5.8. When pH was lowered to 4, approximately half of the cells died within 3 h. Figure 4B shows that content of LDH in the sac supernatant (an index of cell death) did not change as pH was lowered from 7.4 to 4.9 and increased significantly when the mucosal sac was filled with Krebs solution at pH 4.0, confirming trypan blue data.
|
|
into the surrounding medium, however, did not occur after a 3-h exposure to acidic medium and did not change from the value measured for nonacidified mucosa, regardless of pH. In subsequent experiments, to study the effect of HCl exposure, the mucosal sac was filled with Krebs solution at pH 5.8.
Similar to Fig. 3, Fig. 5 shows that HCl-treated mucosa (pH 5.8) contained significantly (P < 0.05) higher levels of IL-6 than untreated mucosa (increasing from 443 ± 157 to 938 ± 81 pg/mg protein). We next compared these results to preparations of the esophageal mucosal tube from animals with experimental esophagitis, which was induced by repeated in vivo HCl esophageal perfusion (i.e., animals were perfused for 45 min with 0.1 N HCl for 3 days and tested on day 4) (3, 37). IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the mucosa from esophagitis animals (819 ± 81 pg/mg protein) than in control samples (pH 7.4 Krebs-treated mucosa). Similarly, IL-1
increased in HCl-treated mucosa (from 26.7 ± 9 to 498.7 ± 163.6 pg/mg protein) and was elevated in the mucosa from esophagitis animals compared with normal (pH 7.4) Krebs-treated mucosa. Of interest, levels of IL-6 and IL-1
were comparable between in vitro HCl-treated mucosa and mucosa from animals with esophagitis induced by HCl-induced perfusion.
|
, the cytokine was not released in the mucosa supernatant.
|
antibody (Fig. 7B), confirming that the observed motor changes appear to be mediated largely by the release of IL-6 from the mucosa into the supernatant. The finding that IL-1
antibodies do not reverse the supernatant-induced inhibition is consistent with the lack of IL-1
release by the HCl-treated mucosa.
|
|
|
Figure 10 demonstrates that IL-6 caused production of H2O2 when applied for 2 h to esophageal smooth muscle but not when IL-6 was applied to the mucosa. Figure 11 shows that direct application of HCl, similar to the supernatant of normal mucosa, did not increase the production of H2O2 in esophageal circular muscle. Application of the supernatant from HCl-treated mucosa or of the supernatant of mucosa from esophagitis animals (both containing IL-6) caused the production of H2O2 in the muscle, as did incubation in IL-6.
|
|
|
Figure 13 shows untreated epithelial cells, freshly isolated from the esophageal mucosa by enzymatic digestion, and epithelial cells treated with HCl or IL-6. An H2O2-treated epithelial cell is shown as a positive control in Fig. 13D. H2O2 is membrane permeable, and, in the H2O2-treated cell, it penetrates the cytoplasm, demonstrating the adequacy of the technique in detecting cytoplasmic H2O2, when present. In contrast, in control cells (Fig. 13A) or in cells treated with HCl (Fig. 13B) or with IL-6 (Fig. 13C), little H2O2 was present in the cells' cytoplasmic region, demonstrating that epithelial cells initially do not produce H2O2 in response to HCl or IL-6.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6 in the esophageal circular muscle layer. These cytokines inhibit neurally mediated contraction of esophageal circular muscle but do not affect contraction in response to direct myogenic stimulation with ACh and thus reproduce the effect of acute experimental esophagitis on esophageal contraction (3).
Cytokines are thought to derive from inflammatory cells infiltrating acid-damaged tissue (32) and may produce additional inflammatory mediators by acting on muscle cells and causing them to produce their own cytokines (39). This initiates a cycle in which inflammatory mediators released by a cell type affect other cells to create additional inflammatory mediators, which may in turn affect the original cells, further increasing the formation of inflammatory mediators and creating a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation (11). Examining tissues with developed inflammation, as we have previously done in our model of in vivo-induced esophagitis, may provide insufficient clues toward understanding how inflammation develops. We know that in the model of esophagitis induced by repeated acid perfusion on 3 consecutive days, IL-1
, IL-6, platelet-activating factor (PAF), and H2O2 are all present in the circular muscle layer (3, 4, 7, 8) and contribute to esophagitis-associated dysmotility. However, any of these inflammatory products may contribute to the formation of the others. Thus defining the sequential production of inflammatory mediators in reflux esophagitis and their tissues of origin seems essential to a better understanding of the genesis of GERD pathophysiology.
To examine the interaction of the mucosa and circular muscle in originating changes in muscle contraction in response to inflammation, we examined the effect of HCl on in vitro esophageal mucosa and circular muscle.
As expected, EFS-induced contraction of circular smooth muscle in PSS was not modified by the presence of mucosal tissue in the organ bath. In addition, muscle contraction was not affected by direct exposure to HCl (at pH 5.8). When the mucosa and HCl at the same pH were incubated with circular muscle, however, contraction was almost abolished, suggesting that in the presence of acid the mucosa released inhibitory factors affecting muscle contraction.
Our in vitro mucosal sac preparation was designed to distinguish the inflammatory mediators released by the mucosal layer from those produced in the circular muscle layer in response to the mucosa. Because the mucosal sac was created by removing the muscle at the level of the submucosa, it is reasonable to assume that anything that is secreted by the mucosal sac and collected in the supernatant would have diffused to the circular muscle layer in an intact esophagus.
In vitro, the esophageal mucosa was very sensitive to the presence of HCl, producing inflammatory/inhibitory mediators at a relatively high pH (5.8). Typically, to induce experimental esophagitis, the in vivo esophagus is perfused for 45 min on 3 successive days with 0.1 N HCl. In contrast, in the in vitro mucosa, lowering the pH to 5.8 for 3 h induced maximal production of the cytokines IL-1
and IL-6. Further lowering the pH to 4 caused tissue damage, resulting in cell death and reduced production of cytokines. The in vitro mucosa may be more susceptible to damage than when in vivo, due to lack of buffering mechanisms. The in vitro mucosa has no blood flow, and neutralization of the intraluminal pH can only occur by passive diffusion of electrolytes from the medium surrounding the mucosal sac. In contrast, the in vivo mucosa may better resist a low intraluminal pH as it is continuously perfused and buffered by blood flow and exposed to saliva at high pH. In contrast to the mucosa, the circular smooth muscle, EFS-induced contraction, and production of H2O2 were not affected by acute exposure to acid at the same concentration or even at concentrations three to four times higher (L. Cheng, unpublished observations) than the ones causing release of inflammatory mediators by the mucosa.
Because IL-1
and IL-6 are present in the esophageal circular muscle layer in our model of in vivo-induced experimental esophagitis, we examined the possibility that these inflammatory mediators may be produced in the mucosa in response to HCl and may diffuse to the circular muscle layer. Using this model of in vitro-induced inflammation, we found that IL-1
and IL-6 were produced in the mucosa in response to HCl. Only IL-6, however, was collected in the supernatant outside the mucosal sac when the lumen was filled with HCl. Thus enough IL-6 is produced and released by the mucosa to diffuse past the submucosal layer into the surrounding supernatant at a concentration sufficient to affect circular muscle contraction. In contrast, IL-1
produced in the mucosa in response to HCl was not released into the supernatant and remained confined to the mucosa.
These data suggest that, in this model of in vitro inflammation, IL-6 is a major inhibitory mediator released by the mucosa in response to HCl, as the effect of exposure to the supernatant of HCl-treated mucosa on muscle contraction is inhibited to a large extent by immunoneutralization of the supernatant with IL-6 antibodies. Introducing IL-1
antibody into the supernatant did not affect the supernatant-induced inhibition (Fig. 7B), and this finding is consistent with the lack of IL-1
release by the HCl-treated mucosa.
In contrast, when circular muscle strips were incubated with the supernatant of mucosa from esophagitis animals, EFS-induced contraction was almost abolished, but the inhibition was only partly reversed by IL-6 antibodies. This finding suggests that, after 3 days of acid perfusion, the mucosa of esophagitis animals may release other inflammatory mediators in addition to IL-6. The finding of H2O2 in the supernatant of mucosa from esophagitis animals may identify one of the additional inflammatory mediators. Other inflammatory mediators or other ROS may also be present.
We have previously demonstrated that both IL-6 and IL-1
are present in the esophageal circular muscle layer of animals with in vivo-induced acute experimental esophagitis (3) and may produce H2O2, which in turn may cause the production of other inflammatory mediators (8). We therefore examined whether IL-6, released by the mucosa in response to HCl, may cause the production of H2O2 in either the mucosa or muscle.
Application of HCl or IL-6 did not induce the production of H2O2 by the mucosa. Similarly, direct application of HCl did not cause the production of H2O2 by muscle. Application of IL-6 or the supernatant from HCl-treated mucosa, however, caused the production of H2O2 by muscle, and incubation in the supernatant of mucosa from animals with in vivo-induced esophagitis also caused the production of H2O2 by muscle.
H2O2 is one of several ROS that may be produced and is present in inflamed tissues. Other ROS include superoxide anion (·O2), H2O2, and hydroxyl radical (·OH) and the reactive nitrogen species nitric oxide (NO) and peroxynitrite (ONOO). H2O2 is produced mainly from dismutation of ·O2. This reaction can be spontaneous, or it can be catalyzed by superoxide dismutase (SOD), of which there are three isoforms: CuZn SOD, Mn SOD, and extracellular SOD (13). The SOD-catalyzed dismutation is favored when the concentration of ·O2 is low and when the concentration of SOD is high, which occurs under physiological conditions. H2O2 is lipid soluble, crosses cell membranes, and has a longer half-life than ·O2, which is unstable. H2O2 is physiologically produced in large amounts by cells such as granulocytes and in lower amounts by nonimmune cells (6, 38, 42). Because H2O2 is relatively stable, it has been widely used to assess the effects of ROS (26, 28).
We have recently demonstrated that in a human specimen with esophagitis tone of muscle strips was considerably lower (0.78 g) than in the normal LES (3.3 ± 0.2g) and was almost restored to normal (2.7 g) by the H2O2 scavenger catalase (10). The finding that catalase almost normalized the tone of the esophagits specimen indicates that, among all ROS, H2O2 is likely to play a major role in esophagitis-associated motor dysfunction and is entirely consistent with the results shown in Fig. 12. Figure 12 shows that contraction of esophageal circular muscle in response to EFS (i.e., neural stimulation) was almost abolished by the supernatant of the HCl-filled mucosal sac and that the selective H2O2 scavenger catalase restored by
70% the reduction induced by the supernatant. Taken together, these data suggest that H2O2 may play a major role in esophageal dysmotility.
Although superoxide may be the original ROS produced by a variety of sources, it is membrane impermeable, unstable, and short lived, and in physiological conditions, in aqueous solutions at a neutral pH, the favored reaction of superoxide anion is the dismutation reaction yielding H2O2.
H2O2 may cause lipid peroxidation and release of calcium from intracellular stores (31) and diffuses across biological membranes (41) because the molecule is not electrically charged. Thus H2O2 may diffuse to the nucleus, altering protein expression in the cell (15). In our model of in vivo-induced acute esophagitis, it is likely that IL-6, released by the mucosa after exposure to HCl, may cause the production of H2O2 by muscle. H2O2, in turn, may cause the production of multiple inflammatory mediators in the muscle layer, including IL-1
, which is found in the muscle layer after 3 days of repeated perfusion with HCl. The role of ROS in cytokine expression is not entirely clear, but it is generally accepted that ROS activate NF-
B and other transcription factors, resulting in upregulation of inflammatory cytokine gene expression (21, 25, 43). Once H2O2 is present, causing the formation of cytokines by muscle, a vicious circle may be initiated, because cytokines may cause the production of additional H2O2, worsening the injury. In addition, H2O2 may diffuse to the mucosa, causing the formation of additional inflammatory mediators by the mucosa and perhaps initiating the production of H2O2 in the mucosa itself, which initially does not produce H2O2.
It is notable that even though H2O2 is produced in the esophageal muscle layer, including in muscle cells, at concentrations sufficient to affect contraction, its effect is not evident in esophageal muscle cells but rather in motor neurons. As shown in Figs. 7, 12, and 15, incubation in the supernatant of HCl-treated mucosa almost abolished contraction in response to electrical (i.e., neural) stimulation but had no effect on contraction in response to direct myogenic stimulation by ACh. In this respect, the effect of incubation in the supernatant from HCl-treated mucosa is similar to that of in vivo-induced esophagits, where we have shown that esophageal motor function is impaired (3). After in vivo induction of experimental esophagitis, the in vivo amplitude of the pressure excursion recorded during swallowing was drastically reduced compared with normal animals, and the contraction of circular muscle strips in response to EFS, which is neurally mediated, was significantly reduced. In contrast, contraction in response to the neurotransmitter ACh, which directly activates muscarinic receptors on the muscle cell membrane, was not affected, suggesting that muscle function is not directly affected by esophagitis-related inflammation. In contrast, the neurons mediating esophageal contraction are affected by in vivo-induced inflammation, and the observed inflammation-induced changes reflect the reduced release of the endogenous neurotransmitter ACh (3). We (8) have previously shown that H2O2, produced in response to IL-6 in esophageal circular muscle, causes the production of PGE2 and PAF in the muscle layer, which in turn inhibit the release of ACh in response to electrical (i.e, neural) field stimulation. This finding may explain how, in the present model of in vitro inflammation, incubation in the supernatant of HCl-treated mucosa inhibits neural but not direct myogenic stimulation of the circular muscle.
A possible sequence of events leading to HCl-induced esophageal inflammation may be the production of cytokines or other inflammatory mediators by the mucosa, diffusion of these inflammatory mediators to circular muscle, and the production of H2O2 by the muscle (Figure 16). H2O2 may then diffuse through the muscle and mucosa, inducing the production of other inflammatory mediators and resulting in upregulation of H2O2-producing enzymes in the mucosa, within 3 days of the onset of inflammation. Thus the initial development of inflammation may depend on the interaction of muscle and mucosa in releasing distinct inflammatory mediators to act on both.
|
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
directly affects barrier function of cultured intestinal epithelial monolayers. J Clin Invest 83: 724727, 1989.[ISI][Medline]
, IL-6 and IL-8 in active esophagitis (Abstract). Gastroenterology 122: A-420, 2002.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Cheng, W. Cao, C. Fiocchi, J. Behar, P. Biancani, and K. M. Harnett HCl-induced inflammatory mediators in cat esophageal mucosa and inflammatory mediators in esophageal circular muscle in an in vitro model of esophagitis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): G1307 - G1317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||